This page is referenced multiple times on others, but essentially boils down to, "Here's why you should play Vampire the Requiem and not Masquerade."
If this page can have comments about how Requiem's concepts are inherently "better" than Masquerade's, it should also have comments about how several of these concepts failed.
On the other hand, I think it should be rewritten without any bias at all.
98.110.145.144 07:13, December 30, 2015 (UTC) Mishmoo
Alright. Maybe you should start improving the article. Let's see how it goes. Russel Hammond (talk) 13:28, December 30, 2015 (UTC)
Added a number of changes, making the article's language more neutral and referencing things in terms of intention more than in terms of some abstract of success. (Mass Embraces especially got my goat - saying that they were a cheap tactic when they were explicitly written into the canon and used rather well.) 98.110.145.144 04:18, December 31, 2015 (UTC) Mishmoo
Good job. Russel Hammond (talk) 15:08, December 31, 2015 (UTC)
VTM "ended" or not?[]
"Vampire: The Masquerade went through multiple revisions before ending and being replaced by Vampire: The Requiem." this doesn't really make sense to me, seeing how VTR was released 2004, while VTM V5 was released 2018 and advanced the metaplot, which, therefore, can't have ended, to my understanding? was this the case before V5 when WhiteWolf (as I suspect) saw many players who liked VTM better and decided to continue it despite originally saying otherwise? in that case this should probably be clarified both here and on the VTR page.